The research and effort I have been putting into this project has been exhausting, and at times depressing. I had decided I needed to review all the tabs in my browsers I have open (dozens!) and get some closure on a few. I happened upon things I evidently found months ago and did not relate to at the time. I am easily distracted by shiny objects in the rearview mirror so anything can happen to my concentration. A few open tabs were enlightening, but this one was moderately entertaining. I can’t decide whether the old lady really was a brat and liked conflict or if she was settling some scores. Her will, to me, was a hoot!
She died back in 1888 so I doubt I am spilling any beans when I say Hannah McCrystal was “weak of body but sound of mind” (her own words in her final will and testament). She left her farm: Land, Stock and Chattels to her son, Michael, as long as her paid her just debts. To the rest of her children, Henry, Thomas, John, Patrick, Peter and daughter, Jane, she left One Shilling each. Her estate at that time was 98 pounds, 8 shillings. So Michael received 98 pounds, 1 Shilling (equivalent in lands and holdings). I have to assume he was the responsible one who stayed and took care of his mother.
Of course, it could be this wasn’t random pettiness — leaving someone exactly one shilling was a deliberate legal device. It proved the testator hadn’t simply forgotten a child (which could invalidate a will or open it to challenge) — it documented “I remembered you, I considered you, and I am choosing to give you almost nothing.” It was the Victorian/Edwardian way of saying I see you, and the answer is no in a form that would hold up if contested.
At any rate, this was entertaining to read. I also discovered about 75 wills relating to the McCrystal name that are online through PRONI. I am expecting to be entertained a lot more times.
Have you seen a will or other legal document relating to your potential ancestors that entertained or astounded you? If so, add a comment below and tell us about it!